Tripism founder and CEO Adam Kerr
Traditionally, the travel buyer has been
responsible for building and maintaining a corporate travel program:
negotiating supplier agreements, setting policy, driving compliance, and
measuring performance through reporting cycles.
But AI is beginning to shift where many of those
responsibilities sit. As booking decisions become increasingly influenced—and
in some cases executed—by AI systems, the buyer is no longer simply managing
outcomes. The role is evolving towards shaping the logic that determines those
outcomes in the first place.
That evolution matters not only for travel
managers, but also for suppliers. Airlines, hotel groups, rail operators and
travel technology providers have spent years optimizing for human
decision-making: sales relationships, negotiated discounts, loyalty benefits
and traveler preferences. Increasingly, however, supplier visibility and
selection will depend on how effectively products, policies and value
propositions can be interpreted by AI-driven systems.
Most travel policies today were written for human
interpretation. They allow for nuance, discretion and ambiguity. AI systems do
not operate comfortably with ambiguity. For automation to function
consistently, policies must become structured, explicit and machine readable.
Traveler entitlements, approval hierarchies, supplier preferences and policy
exceptions all need to be defined in ways a system can interpret and apply in
real time.
That creates both a challenge and an opportunity
for travel managers. Those who can translate policy into clear operational
logic are likely to see stronger compliance, faster decision-making and more
consistent traveler experiences. Those who cannot may find automation simply
exposes inconsistencies that already existed within the program.
But it also creates new pressures for suppliers. As
AI systems become increasingly responsible for recommending or executing
bookings, suppliers need to rethink how their products are distributed and
described. Those that aren't are already falling behind. Corporate travel
programs built around AI-driven decisioning will favor suppliers whose content
is structured, accessible and easy for systems to evaluate dynamically.
In practice, that means suppliers being assessed
not only on price, but also on the completeness and usability of their data.
Room attributes, ancillary products, disruption policies, sustainability
metrics, traveler servicing capabilities and fulfilment reliability will all
become increasingly important inputs into automated booking decisions.
Historically, many supplier negotiations have
revolved around volume commitments and negotiated discounts. AI changes the
context. Instead of evaluating suppliers through periodic reviews and quarterly
reporting cycles, buyers can begin assessing supplier performance continuously
and in real time.
Traveler satisfaction, booking behavior, policy
adherence, disruption response and actual usage of negotiated benefits can all
become measurable performance indicators. AI systems can identify patterns
immediately: whether travelers routinely reject a preferred supplier,
whether disruption handling is driving dissatisfaction or whether negotiated
amenities are rarely being delivered or used.
For buyers and suppliers alike, this drives a shift
from static negotiations at certain intervals to a continuous review model.
Suppliers in particular will experience a shift in commercial strategies,
because winning will
depend less on securing a place in the program once a year and more on
consistently performing well within the live operating environment of that
program every day.
It also raises the importance of interoperability
and integration. Suppliers whose systems can easily connect with booking tools,
expense platforms and AI-enabled servicing environments hold an advantage over
those still reliant on fragmented or limited distribution models. In an
AI-driven ecosystem, friction itself becomes a competitive weakness.
AI also speeds up decision-making and enables
decisions to be influenced in real time. This does not remove the need for the
travel buyer. Instead, it changes the focus of the role from analyzing what has
already happened to governing how the program behaves while it is being used by
the people it is designed for.
Travel managers move closer to overseeing systems,
adjusting parameters and ensuring AI-driven decisions remain aligned with
program goals, traveler expectations and corporate governance requirements.
That shift will require closer collaboration with suppliers as programs become
more dynamic and responsive.
At the same time, accountability becomes more
important, not less. If a system recommends an out-of-policy booking,
misapplies a negotiated rate or fails to meet duty-of-care expectations,
responsibility still sits within the program. Systems relying on generalized AI
models may produce recommendations that sound credible but are not necessarily
accurate. In a corporate travel environment, that creates risk across
compliance, cost control and governance.
Suppliers, therefore, face a dual challenge. They
must not only participate in AI-enabled ecosystems, but also help build trust
within them. Reliable data, transparent rules, consistent fulfilment and clear
servicing processes will become just as commercially important as price
competitiveness.
The net effect is not the removal of the travel
buyer. It is an elevation of the role. Negotiation, stakeholder management,
supplier strategy and market knowledge remain essential, but they are now
complemented by a new set of responsibilities: designing programs that can be
executed by systems as well as people, ensuring that data is accurate and
accessible, and overseeing how AI-driven decisions are made and refined over
time.
In many organizations, the travel buyer is
evolving from program manager to decision architect. Suppliers and buyers alike
must recognize that the
next competitive battle in managed travel will not be fought in the RFP alone,
but inside the algorithms increasingly shaping traveler choices behind the
scenes.